// Comparison
Apollo vs Lusha
Apollo is a broad prospecting platform with a large B2B database plus built-in sequencing and dialing. Lusha is leaner, known for accurate direct dials and mobile numbers delivered through a browser extension that surfaces contacts on LinkedIn and company sites. Choose Apollo when you want one tool to build lists and run outreach end to end. Choose Lusha when phone-number accuracy and a fast extension workflow matter more than a full outbound suite, especially for reps who live inside LinkedIn.
The third option
If phone accuracy is the deciding factor, note that both charge per reveal or per seat to get there. Trackyr prices a verified phone at 2 credits and a verified email at 1, with every number re-checked on a rolling basis rather than trusted from the day it was scraped. Provenance is attached to each record, so you can see where a dial came from before you make it.
Switching from one of these? Trackyr vs Apollo · Trackyr vs Lusha
// Common questions
Apollo vs Lusha, answered.
Is Lusha better than Apollo for phone numbers?+
Lusha is often praised for direct-dial and mobile accuracy via its extension. Apollo has phone data too but is valued more as an all-in-one prospecting and outreach platform.
Does Apollo have a browser extension like Lusha?+
Yes, Apollo offers a LinkedIn extension, but Lusha's extension is its core product and is built specifically around fast contact reveals on profiles and company pages.
Which is better for small sales teams?+
Apollo suits teams that want database, sequencing, and dialing in one seat. Lusha suits reps who mainly need accurate contact reveals and already use a separate outreach tool.
Skip the trade-off.
Creator + B2B contacts in one verified pool, paid only for what you use.
Start hunting →