// Comparison
Lusha vs Cognism
Both emphasize phone data, at different scales. Lusha is self-serve and reps-friendly, with a browser extension that reveals direct dials and emails quickly and affordably. Cognism is an enterprise platform with phone-verified mobile numbers, EU/UK coverage, and GDPR-oriented compliance, sold on annual contracts. Choose Lusha for fast, low-commitment contact reveals for individuals or small teams. Choose Cognism if you need verified mobiles at scale, European coverage, and stronger compliance handling across a larger sales organization.
The third option
These are the per-reveal and the annual-contract ends of the phone-data market. Trackyr is neither — usage credits, 2 for a verified phone, with reuse of the shared pool free and nothing to commit to for a year. Numbers are sourced from public data with provenance and DSAR support and re-checked on a rolling cadence, so a dial doesn't rot between campaigns.
Switching from one of these? Trackyr vs Lusha · Trackyr vs Cognism
// Common questions
Lusha vs Cognism, answered.
Is Lusha or Cognism better for phone numbers?+
Cognism offers phone-verified mobiles at enterprise scale with strong EU/UK coverage. Lusha provides accurate dials through its extension at a lower, self-serve price for smaller teams.
Which is more affordable?+
Lusha. It's self-serve with accessible tiers, whereas Cognism is an annual-contract enterprise platform that generally costs more.
Which is better for GDPR compliance?+
Cognism markets GDPR-oriented features and notified prospecting for European outreach. Lusha is usable in Europe but is positioned more as a quick-reveal tool than a compliance platform.
Skip the trade-off.
Creator + B2B contacts in one verified pool, paid only for what you use.
Start hunting →